肖生克的救赎阅读心得体会900字

肖生克的救赎阅读心得体会900字（共2篇）

肖生克的救赎阅读心得体会900字 篇1

人的行为被束缚，但是思想仍然能存活，能像火焰一样跳跃，内心的东西是别人夺不走的。

如果坚持一件事二十年，自然会成功。看到影片末尾才明白，原来安迪从进监狱的那一天就已经在谋划一个几十年后越狱的计划，因为他无罪，他有这个能力，哪怕囚于狱中二十年，但是他与监狱中的每一个人都不同，与诺顿(监狱长)贪婪、丑恶面目不同的善良，与老布被“监狱化”的思想不同的清醒。他深信内心有些东西是别人不能夺走的，他深信高墙不能封闭人灵魂的自由哪怕它能限制人的行动，二十年来从未消失的的希望和狱中磨累仍旧不能磨灭的对自由的渴望是救赎的良药，在风雨交加的夜晚越狱成功时，在泥塘中仰天的兴奋是安迪重获自由的激动，安迪实现了自我救赎，或许说，安迪本无罪。

瑞德是肖申克监狱中的“权威人士”，多次真诚的假释未能成功，但是监狱长更换之后，一段发自内心的话语让他重获自由，看似得罪了监狱的人员，但是，“不在乎”确是已经实现第一次救赎。

瑞德出狱了，但是“制度化”使得他根本无法生活下去，甚至四十年以来上厕所一直打报告的习惯让他与外面的世界格格不入。老布在头发斑白之际释放出狱，但是他已经融入不了这个世界，出了监狱，他再也无法正常生活，终于在思考之下用绳子结束了自己的生命，最终害死他的是监狱的制度，而不是社会的变更。瑞德想过重新犯罪再次回到监狱，但是安迪的第二次救赎，使得瑞德真正“出狱”。

数十年的监狱生活已经让瑞德和老布制度化，因为心中的希望已在监狱中慢慢磨灭，这无疑是监狱最可怕的地方，肉体被囚禁的时间长了，心灵也逃不出高墙。但是安迪不同，他受过教育，在监狱中未曾间断的自我救赎没让他的知识被殴打、禁闭所消减，而是成为他越狱的工具。安迪是一个善良的人，不仅自我救赎，给“同事”送啤酒、教人识字读书考文凭，更救赎了瑞德，揭穿诺顿的罪行，变革了整个肖申克监狱。

人的行为被束缚，但是思想仍然能存活，能像火焰一样跳跃。内心的东西是别人夺不走的，只有自己有没有据守它的说法。在监狱中，安迪坚持了二十年的事最终成功了，背后是他那一直都在的希望，是一颗强大的内心，最后得到的是他梦寐以求的自由。

最终，两个老朋友在小岛再次相遇。

肖生克的救赎英文观后感 篇2

Before Andy went into the Shaw shank, the topic here is nothing but metamorphosis, fighting or killing time. Confusion, dirty, fear, despair gathered together to create a harsh environment. The prisoners have no human rights at all. They are free to sell the warden their cheap labor. After Andy’ coming, although this unwilling banker can not change the oppression and abuse of prisoners, he at least brought hope, a breath of life, even liberty. This hope is different from the verbal warden said, “I am the light of the world. I would not have you follow the dark” because he is a downright “false Christ” by the name of Christ. He is just a matter of the devils trip. His brutal disposition is to let the prisoners succumbed to “discipline and the Bible”, and even “Want you to eat you eat, want you to pee you pee ”. Everyone in Shaw shank is institutionalized, resulting in the death of the Brooks, leading to Red’s still having no rights and intendance to bring the“ instructions ”of the brand, losing hope that his life will not always be like a normal person. The warden is precisely to completely obliterate the hope of Shaw shank prisoners for the future.

“The Shaw shank Redemption” is successful and impressing in the territory of moralizing audiences. All virtuous quality of every role make us happy from the bottom of our hearts., Moreover, the background music in company with the plot also delight us at the same time. To sum up, it is not only a movie, but also a flawless display directing us to freedom and goodness.

It is the first time that I have watched “The Shaw shank Redemption”, which is said to be one of the most meaningful movies in the world. At the beginning of the movie, I felt embarrassed about the sexual scene. Then, with the plot developing, I found that this is a movie almost all actors of which are female. However, it is still full of warmth and touch. I indulged in it at once.

I am moved by Andy’s willing self-punishment. He knew he is innocent, but he was actually sorry for that he dismissed his wife and didn’t give her enough love and care, which led to her death indirectly. Therefore, he undertook the seventeen-year experience in jail without any complaints. It is a behavior out of redemption, which is magnanimous in fact.

At the same time, the negative roles also impress me a lot. The warden is so greedy and vicious that he compels Andy to assist him in wealth accumulation and tax evasion, otherwise Andy would be violated by a bunch of gays. And the guard was extremely selfish and cruel. He can punish any prisoner in any way at any time without a guilty conscience. The most common punishment is brawl. There’ no need worrying about taking responsibility of the prisoners’ death. For another thing, prisoners do not dare and have no access to sue them/ For another, they can make up the causes of their death to cover the truth. The prisoners’ lives are actually in their hand. To some extent, they are like some governors.

Why does it impress me a lot? Firstly, it is institutionalizing which wrecks humanity. In the prison, no doubt that Red lives a relatively easy life, and also, he is very wise. He can meet anyone’s needs. He knows the nature of the life in the prison clearly. He said to Andy, “Hope is dangerous”, which is intellectual man’s tongue. In real life, people will say, “Red is very seasoned” and so on. But, as these so-called “wise men”, Red had never thought of fighting, let alone influencing or changing others. He just conforms to the rules in order to protect himself. He doesn’t change until Andy’s appearance, which eventually leads him to the freedom.

Brooks, of course, the librarians, is another most shocking role. His whole life is a profound reflection of the “institutionalized” servants life. Brooks spent a lifetime in the prison. After he was finally released on parole, got free, and left the familiar surroundings, familiar people, he felt loss of his value, and he can not find his place. He had the freedom of the body but in fact, his soul had been strangled. The world belonging to him has been compressed to a minimum. Eventually he can only choose to end his life. Why should arrange such a role as Brooks? I think the director is trying to tell us, if Andy doesn’t appear, the vast majority of prisoners, including Red, can be Brookes in the near future. Isn’t Brooks like too many people in real life?