gre写作练习题怎么做好

2025-04-07|版权声明|我要投稿

gre写作练习题怎么做好(精选8篇)

gre写作练习题怎么做好 篇1

gre写作考试练习怎么进行?

精通gre写作练习题

为了达到公平,公布了考试的所有gre写作练习题。为了与母语者竞争,考生应在考试前预习所有试题(节省考试时间),通过写100-150篇大纲来了解GRE写作的总体结构,通过写30-50篇文章来练习自己的写作思路和表达方式。练习题里的试题越熟练,考试就越好。

新的GRE写作遇到了评论家对论文评分的想法

每个评论员都很快地评论你的文章。不可能把每一个细节都看得很仔细。考生应迎合阅卷人的阅卷思维,用最规范的结构和最清晰的表达方式来反映自己的思维:第一段要明确提出自己的观点,gre写作方法, gre备考要多久中间段要打开,每段的开头应该是该段的主题句。

新GRE写作评分注重三个方面

首先,根据公布的各评分环节的评分标准,其评分主要集中在以下三个方面:

逻辑分析能力(洞察力要求)

文章组织(要求组织良好)

语言能力(标准书面英语;简明;可变结构等)

尽可能提高人工智能部分的写作能力,确保AA部分满分

由于aa的写作不涉及自身观点的发展,只需要指出作者的逻辑漏洞,因此经过训练后写作并不困难;而ai的写作则需要发展自己的观点,不仅需要逻辑洞察力,还需要展示观点的能力,而且语言组织能力强,所以对中国考生来说很难。在这段时间里,情况有了很大改善。

GRE写作高分范文:法律的灵活性

Laws should not be stationary and fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.

法律不应该是僵化或固定的,而应该根据不同的环境、时期和地点而足够灵活。

GRE写作范文:

Should laws be stable and fixed or be flexible in taking consideration of various factors such as circumstances, times and places? The speaker concludes that instead of being stationary, laws should be constantly changing. The speaker’s claim have merits in declaring that law should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances since adaptation to changing social environment is how the law properly guard the function of social engine and the general welfare of people as a whole. But to some extent, we would not go too much in neglecting to importance of the stability of laws because they are the principles we adhere to in our daily life, if changed too abruptly and constantly, will result in egregious chaos and confusion.

Keeping stability, consistency of laws is indispensable in helping people to make prediction of the consequence of their behaviors and figure out the legal obligation and rights exerted upon them by the legal system. In the personal level, consistency of laws defines the properness and legality of their doings and thus endows people with sense of security and good citizenship. If as the speaker claimed that laws should never be stationary or fixed, people face the threat of being constantly threw into turbid mud of bewilderment and insecurity and finally lose their sight in how to adapt to sudden alternation of in this aspect or another.

Another example that aptly illustrates this is in the field of business. As we know, the ultimate goal of a business is to maximize its profit of shareholders within the framework of laws to define that a enterprises function within this framework, obey its obligation and hamper no interest of the general welfare of the society. In order for a enterprises to thrive, it must carefully study the relevant business laws, including anti-dumping law and torts, etc.Given the choice, most leaders are unwilling to see the prospect that laws are constantly changing since it takes time and effort to build a well-defined frames within companies and overthrow established practice and code would demand another round of revising and reevaluation....

GRE写作高分范文:如何避免偏激

GRE作文题目:

Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.

人们总是在寻找相同点,即使是在非常不同的事物间也不例外,甚至有时候这样做是无用乃至有害的。实际上,我们应该具体问题具体分析;我们应该尽量避免比较的倾向。

GRE写作正文:

In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.

Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one

may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.

Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.

In the newly development software engineering model named Object-oriented model,the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as the core and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put into same “classes” and common points are processed together, later they are defined, discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics. This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and over again on similar, if not utterly same, terms. Translated into daily life, starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to grasp distinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we should always bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness and efficiency.

gre写作练习题怎么做好 篇2

怎么提高GRE写作能力:两大方法介绍

提高方法一: 大量阅读

1. 读文章

考生必须体会地道的、漂亮的语言是怎么写出来的,通过对范文的语言内容和逻辑的理解来学习写作中词汇的使用、句型的使用。在阅读中,你有机会把语言与语言所包含的内容、思维方式联系起来。范文中的一个词或者词组、句式,由于处在具体的语言环境中,你就能体会到它的确切内涵和外延,以及用法,通过不断的积累这些好词好句的用法,你的写作用词和炼句的能力就稳步的提高。因此,对于考生来说,不要死记范文,应该怎么利用范文呢?从宏观角度说:要从范文中提炼文章的结构和逻辑层级,也就是论证体系。从微观角度说,要从范文中提炼语言点(词、短语、句式)。

2. 读历史、哲学、政治等相关书籍,储备GRE写作必须的知识量

GRE写作之所以有其独特的魅力,是因为所考的题目特点涉及大量的哲学观点、宗教、政治、艺术、社会问题、历史现象,而且要求考生要有理有据的进行insightful分析和论证,如何做到insightful,你就必须对一些哲学观点有所了解,这样你自然能够分析得透彻、论证得很有说服力,同时对相关话题在知识储备上有所铺垫,否则将无从说起,无话可说。例如GRE的Issue部分有这样一道真题:“Rituals and ceremonies helpdefine a culture. Without them, societies or groups of people have a diminished sense of whothey are.”典礼和仪式有助于确立一种文化,否则人们的社会或群体的角色归属感削弱。怎么去理解ritual,西方社会都有哪些对人影响和大的rituals,rituals和归属感为什么有联系,如何联系在一起的,这个话题如果不对宗教有所了解,肯定感觉无从下手。

其次,GRE写作,有其是Issue写作对于论据的要求是非常高的,因此你的名人事例的储备,相关知识量的积累是非常重要的,历史长河中的大量的事例是你最有说服力的例证,这一环节也正是GRE考生最为头疼的一部分,举不出支持自己的观点的例子,因此让自己的文章显得只有苍白的论证,缺乏说服力。因此要多读历史,积累例子,有其关注那些重要的哲学家、科学家、艺术家、政治领袖、商业领袖他们的生平事迹、主要贡献。例如Issue里的这样一道真题:“Truly profound thinkers and highly creative artists are alwaysout of step with their time and their society.”真正影响深远的思想家和具有高度创造力的艺术家们总是与他们的时代和社会步伐不一致。这个题目你如果没有必备的那些思想家和艺术家的例子,文章必然缺乏说服力。因此读历史积累写作素材,具体说就是论据素材是拿GRE作文高分的一个重要环节。

提高方法二:研习题库、写提纲、练习

Argument部分题库一共242个题目,首先要熟悉每一个题目,因为题目就是从这242个题目中随机的抽取,对于每一个题目找出主要的逻辑错误,也就是Argument题目的提纲,同时每一个逻辑错误准备一套语言套路去说,本书的Argument部分对每个逻辑错误都给出了详细的解析,同时提供了详细的攻击框架和漂亮的论证语言。写完242个题目的提纲后,写10-15篇完整的文章(语言能力弱的话,可以增加写作量),找partner帮你改,知道错误以后重写。

Issue部分题库一共243个题目,写提纲对于这一部分的备考是至关重要的,也是最占用时间、最核心的一个环节,每一个题目的提纲力求详细,不用去写开头段和结尾段,就写正文各段你的各个分支观点,也就是正文部分的论证过程,除了论证以外,写完后想想可以用些什么论据,把支持论证的论据也写上。这里,再次强调的是,一定要较为详细的写Issue提纲,否则,在考场如果遇到没有思考过的题目,很容易乱了阵脚,临场去想,导致失败。此外,题目必须考前按题材分类去写提纲,看懂,知道对立面和大致写作思路,往往论据在同类的很多题目中通用;写完提纲后,再写20-40篇完整的文章(语言能力弱的话,尽量多写)。

以上就是为大家介绍的有关GRE写作提高的两大方法,各位参加GRE考试的考生,可以参考上述内容,找到适合自己的备考练习方法,通过练习熟练技巧,为GRE作文做好充分准备。

TIPS:GRE作文题库官方查询地址

Issue的题库

www.ets.org/gre/revised_general/prepare/analytical_writing/issue/pool

Argument的题库

www.ets.org/gre/revised_general/prepare/analytical_writing/argument/pool

GRE考试写作四大高分策略介绍

熟练掌握新GRE写作题库

为了达到公平,ETS公布了GRE考试的所有作文题目,即写作题库,而中国考生,如果要在作文中拿到高分,跟英语国家的学生一争高下,就需要在考前对所有题目都进行预习(节约考试时的审题时间),并通过100-150个提纲的写作了解GRE写作的一般结构,通过30-50篇写作来练习自己的写作思路和表达。对题库中的题目越熟练,对考试越有利。

迎合评卷人的评卷思路

每个评卷人对你文章的评阅速度都非常快,不可能对每个细节都很仔细地去看。考生应该迎合评卷人的评卷思路,用最规范的结构和最清晰的表达来体现自己的思路:首段要鲜明地提出观点,中间段落层次要拉开,每段的开始应该就是该段的topic sentence。这样结构清晰的行文,会增强文章的阅读感,给平均人留下较好的印象。

新GRE写作的评分注重三方面

从ETS公布的各分数段评分标准看,其评分主要注重以下三个方面:①、逻辑分析能力(要求insightful);②、文章的组织(要求 well-organized);③、语言能力(要求standard written English; concise; varied structure等)。所以,考生在准备作文时,也应该把重点投入这方面的练习中。

中国考生建议保ARGU争ISSUE

由于ARGU的写作不牵涉自己观点的展开,只须指出作者逻辑上的漏洞,因此在经过训练以后,写起来并不困难;而ISSUE的写作需要自己展开自己设立的观点,不但需要逻辑上的洞察能力,还需要论证观点的能力,语言组织的能力,因此对于中国考生来讲比较困难,难以短期内有较大提高。但是这两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的,因此考生的策略应该是尽量提高ISSUE部分的写作能力而力保ARUG部分满分或高分。因为如果ARGU部分满分的话,ISSUE部分只需争取在4分以上就可以保证整体作文分数在5分以上。

GRE写作中考生不可不知的丢分点

GRE作文丢分点:逻辑问题

大体上来说,考生们的逻辑问题是最多的。逻辑问题有三种,通篇逻辑,段落之间,段落之中。

其实这可能和我们高中初中的英语教育有关系,大家都很喜欢一条一条摆原因。Firstly, secondly...然后后面至于这个ly后面是什么就不管了,一顿胡扯。也不管这段落与段落之间的衔接是否自然,反正都有什么ly给打头阵。

事实上,中西方的思维总是存在差异,很多时候看管老师们都不懂考生在说什么。考官很困惑,这个例子和这个有关系吗?为什么前面在说A,后面突然B了?

GRE作文丢分点:结构混乱

写GRE作文要记住一点,文章是一个整体,所以开篇结尾和中部内容都是应该有关联的。也就是说,在开头提到的,文中应该有展开,同时在结尾有总结。中文作文里也要求行文流畅,所以文章至少要做到逻辑通顺。

GRE作文丢分点:立场模糊

很多同学都很喜欢写中立观点“A不错,但不够好”,这虽然看起来很客观,但实际上这种新GRE写作对逻辑的要求非常高,要怎样去组织语言,组织相应的论据论点,非常考验人。

有同学想说A事件要瑕疵互见,但是写着写着就乱七八糟,东一块西一块,不知道在讲点什么了。更有厉害的索性冗长的来词,讲了个空话。所以建议刚上手的同学,还是选择一边倒,站定脚跟不放松。即便是真的要写中立观点,实际上也都在A和B之间有所偏好。

GRE作文丢分点:胡乱举例

现在很多老师和教材都会要求练写作的时候先写提纲。于是考生们就只写一个观点,然后后面的例子乱用,或者根本没有弄清楚什么是例子。事实上,这种展开,可以是实例,也可以是虚拟的假设。实例中往往分自己的经验和他人的经验。那么怎样的例子有说服力呢?

一般来说是:名人名事(知名度大)>众人众事(样本大)>自己经历(体会深)>他人经历。假设往往不够有说服力,因为很难涉及到每一个变量。但是假设在有的时候可以行得通,就是在很难说清楚步骤和因果关系的时候,用一个假设场景来推导会让文章变得浅显易懂。

所以建议,在刚开始上手写GRE作文的时候,先不要给自己30分钟的压力,先列出提纲(10分钟),再用30分钟去写,看能写多少。

GRE作文丢分点:观点跑题

记住你的举例一定要死死扣住你的新GRE作文观点,不要是和观点打擦边球的。

GRE考试中例子一定要从论点出发,再回到论点。不要将你的论点发散,后果很可能就是越写越跑题。所以每次写好一篇文章,都看看,论据里的key words是不是和论点里的key words一样,论点里的key words又是不是和题目里的key words一样。你的key words 可以比大题里的key words更加narrow,但是千万不要更加广泛。

有关GRE考试写作的易丢分点就为大家介绍到这里,希望各位考生在复习时特别注意这些问题,认真对待GRE写作。

TIPS:新GRE作文字数要求

字数太少的文章势必低分,因为字数太少,很难将一个问题阐述的非常清楚,尤其是ISSUE。按照考试经验,550---650的ISSUE字数往往最有效。而不是写得越多越好。有些考生,文章写得冗长无比,其实思路混乱,没有逻辑性。这种文章,势必低分。所以,ISSUE作文要拿到高分,关键还是要看文章的组织架构是否合理,论点的展开是否恰当,论证是否有力、到位。这些要求需要一定的字数做保障,但不绝对。至于ARGUMENT,一般来说,字数400以上基本就够了。ARGU的关键是要能准确的找出逻辑错误,并恰当的给予反驳,重点还是在于内容,把要说的观点都写清楚即可,字数同样不需要强求。

GRE作文分数太低?教你正确用GRE写作模板

解决新GRE写作分数低的几条建议

1.有的放矢,充分准备。在备考新GRE作文过程中要多准备例子,并把它们一一写下来,进行分类。一个例子往往可以应对好几个同类的题目,这样做是效率最高的办法。

2.万事开头难,迈出第一步。我们都害怕写新GRE作文,想到要练习写一整篇文章,往往就没有了信心。其实我们可以从练习写作开头段,然后设计文章的提纲开始。写开头段能够让我们以轻松一点的心情着手新GRE写作的准备,并且迅速了解所有的题目,因为GRE考试的题目数量是固定的。

3. 储备积极词汇,用时得心应手。从备考的开始就要着手增加working vocabulary, 当然也包含词组,成语。平时背的词汇往往只是看到它能知道其中文的某个翻译意思,但是我们却不能灵活运用这些词汇进行表达,更不用说在短暂的GRE写作考试时间内用它们遣词造句了。所以,对于一些写作中经常用到的词汇、词组和成语,大家需要掌握的不仅是基本的辨识能力,对于其用法也要能有所了解,记忆的时候结合句子进行背诵,在平时训练时也要加强运用方面的实际练习,这样才能做到信手拈来,挥洒自如。

GRE作文模板使用方法

1. 确定文章主体框架结构,包括引出观点和总结观点的词汇,句式。

2. 确定论证过程的框架,每个支持段落都有各自的论证模式,举例,因果,对比等,确定到论证的逻辑引导词上;

3. 通过改写句子,采用合适的词汇代替以上两步的成果;

4. 改变句式,将各类语法结构加入其中:倒装,独立主格结构,虚拟语气等。

5. 中间各段:<提出分论点><解释分论点><总结分论点/联系主观点>,即在每个分段的最后总结一下分论点和主观点之间的联系。

6. 注意句式变换,尽量不要简单句并列使用。

7. 能够用which、where等连词连起来的句子就尽量连起来,减少零碎句子。

以上就是关于新GRE作文低分的解决建议和模板的使用方法介绍,大家在备考GRE作文的过程中要注意时时总结自己的不足,结合模板进行充分准备和练习,以便在考试时候能够迅速写出高质量的GRE作文。

TIPS:GRE作文题库中的题目如何准备?

新GRE逻辑阅读练习题 篇3

8. The author is primarily concerned with

(A) showing that a certain interpretation is better supported by the evidence than is an alternative explanation

(B) developing an alternative interpretation by using sources of evidence that formerly had been unavailable

(C) questioning the accuracy of the evidence that most scholars have used to counter the author‘s own interpretation

(D) reviewing the evidence that formerly had been thought to obscure a valid interpretation

(E) presenting evidence in support of a controversial version of an earlier interpretation.

9. According to the author, changes in the conditions of international trade resulted in an

(A) underestimation of the amount of new land that was being famed in the United States

(B) underutilization of relatively small but rich plots of land

(C) overexpansion of the world transportation network for shipping agricultural products

(D) extension of agrarian depressions beyond national boundaries

(E) emphasis on the importance of market forces in determining the prices of agricultural products

10. The author implies that, after certain territories and countries had been joined into an interdependent market system in the nineteenth century, agrarian depressions within that system

(A) spread to several nations, excluding those in which the internal frontier remained open

(B) manifested themselves in several nations,including those in which new land remained available for farming

(C) slowed down the pace of new technological developments in international communications and transportation

(D) affected the local and national prices of the nonagricultural products of several nations

(E) encouraged several nations to sell more of their agricultural products on foreign markets

11. The author‘s argument implies that, compared to the yearly price changes that actually occurred on foreign agricultural markets during the 1880‘s, American farmers would have most preferred yearly price changes that were

(A) much smaller and in the same direction

(B) much smaller but in the opposite direction

(C) slightly smaller and in the same direction

(D) similar in size but in the opposite direction

(E) slightly greater and in the same direction

GRE考试填空模拟练习题及答案 篇4

Blank (i)

Blank (ii)

A. unexpected

D. robust

B. feeble

E. turbulent

C. swift

F. predictable

选 BD

翻译:经济复苏某种程度上并不均衡:有些产业积弱不振而有些则颇有活力。

while 引导对比关系。

选项中出现了两对反义词,feeble / robust 以及 unexpected / predictable,强弱对比更符合 lopsided 的设定。

lopsided 不均衡的,不对称的,向一侧倾斜的

unexpected 未料到的,突如其来的

feeble 无力的,弱的

swift (速度、反应等)快的,立即的

robust 健康有力的,精力充沛的,粗壮结实的,粗鲁、喧嚣的,(酒、食物等)醇厚浓烈的

turbulent 流动猛烈而不稳定的,动荡的,失控的

GRE考试阅读理解练习题及答案 篇5

Stylistic evidence and laboratory evidence strongly support the claim that the magnificent painting Garden of Eden is a work of the Flemish master van Eyck. Nevertheless, the painting must have been the work of someone else, as anyone with a little historical and zoological knowledge can tell merely by looking at the painting. The animals in the painting are all vivid representations of actual animals, including armadillos. Yet armadillos are native only to Americas, and van Eyck died decades before Europeans reached the Americas.

2. In the argument given, the two highlighted portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a position that the argument seeks to reject, the second is evidence that the argument uses against that position.

B. The first and the second are each pieces of evidence that have been used to support the position that the argument opposes.

C. The first presents the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that conclusion.

D. The first is a judgment that serves as the basis for the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that main conclusion.

E. The first is an intermediate conclusion drawn in order to support a further conclusion stated in the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that intermediate conclusion.

1

Stylistic evidence and laboratory evidence strongly support the claim that the magnificent painting Garden of Eden is a work of the Flemish master van Eyck.

风格上的和来自实验室的证据,都有力地支持这样的观点,即大画 G o E 出自弗兰德斯派大师 v E 之手。

佛兰德斯艺术 [Flemish art]

佛兰德斯15世纪到17世纪初期的艺术,以生气蓬勃的写实主义和高超的技术造诣而著称。佛兰德斯画派的先驱一般都住在勃艮第大公国的第一个首都第戎。这些大公在1363~1482年间建立了强大的佛兰德斯和勃艮第政治联盟。善良的腓力三世迁都于布鲁日,1425年正式任命 爱克 (1390~1441)为宫廷画师。他的画作代表着早期佛兰德斯绘画的开端,又象征着它的全盛时期。15世纪末,爱克后一代的画家并未一味仿效他,而是面向意大利以求得画面形象结构的发展。R.van der韦登、P.赫里斯特斯、D.包茨、H.van der胡斯、H.梅姆灵和G.戴维等人的画作虽着重创新,但其视觉艺术效果却与爱克相去甚远。16世纪,在H.博斯的影响下,P.勃鲁盖尔(老)将当时的残酷性反映在他的那些生动地描绘了农民生活的作品里。17世纪的大师P.P.鲁本斯精通油画艺术,他的成熟的寓言风格与巴罗克时期的奢华趣味完全吻合。参阅早期尼德兰艺术(early Netherlandish art)。

爱克 [Eyck, Jan van]

(1395年前,神圣罗马帝国 列日主教区 马塞克城~1441.7.9前,布吕赫)

佛兰德斯画家。1422年任荷兰伯爵,巴伐利亚的约翰的室内侍从和宫廷画师。后为勃艮地公爵善良的腓力三世服务。现存确系他的画作只有属于他艺术生涯最后十年的作品,其中10幅有他的签名与日期,这个数目在这个时期已不寻常。爱克的绘画以肖像和宗教为主题,他的画作才华横溢,极富理性,又充满象征意义。代表作品有《羔羊受崇敬》(1432),与其兄休伯特(约1370~1426)合作,该作品以《根特祭坛画》闻名遐迩。他通常被认为是15世纪北欧最伟大的画家。他的作品被大量复制和收藏。

(大英袖珍百科)

2

Nevertheless, the painting must have been the work of someone else, as anyone with a little historical and zoological knowledge can tell merely by looking at the painting.

然而,任何对历史和动物学稍有了解的人,只要看看这幅画,就可以得出结论,作者肯定另有其人。

3

The animals in the painting are all vivid representations of actual animals, including armadillos.

画中的动物都栩栩如生地再现了它们实际的样子,包括犰狳。

(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armadillo)

犰狳(音 求于,猜你也不会念)

4

Yet armadillos are native only to Americas, and van Eyck died decades before Europeans reached the Americas.

但犰狳原产于美洲,且 v E 在欧洲人发现美洲大陆前几十年就去世了。

2. In the argument given, the two highlighted portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a position that the argument seeks to reject, the second is evidence that the argument uses against that position.

B. The first and the second are each pieces of evidence that have been used to support the position that the argument opposes.

C. The first presents the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that conclusion.

D. The first is a judgment that serves as the basis for the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that main conclusion.

E. The first is an intermediate conclusion drawn in order to support a further conclusion stated in the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that intermediate conclusion.

选 C

还是让我们辨析目标句的逻辑功能。

作者的论证,可简述为:

结论 conclusion:大画《伊甸园》的作者必不是凡爱克。

理由 1 reason 1:画中动物都贴合实际,包括犰狳。

理由 2 reason 2:犰狳系美洲原产,但凡爱克死时欧洲人尚未抵达美洲。

reason 1 + reason 2 => conclusion

GRE等价解题如何做好 篇6

GRE填空中的等价题可以算是语文部分难度较高的题型之一,这是因为等价题不仅需要考生具备相应的词汇量基础才能做好,对考生的逻辑思维能力也有较高要求。

GRE等价题出题思路解题技巧理论介绍

之所以说GRE等价题难度最高,是因为其他三种填空题型,考生只要掌握好足够的GRE词汇量,大部分情况下都能够顺利解题。而等价题只靠词汇过关还远远达不到解题要求,考生需要具备词汇量以外的一些解题技巧和能力。

1. 考察逻辑推理分析能力

做好GRE等价题,考生不仅需要掌握词汇,还必须具备逻辑推理分析能力。一道题目6个选项,哪两个能够保证句子意思相同,考生不仅需要完全了解6个选项词汇的含义,还需要做出正确的配对,没有一定的逻辑推理能力很容易就会出现理解错误的情况。特别是当选项中存在不止一组同近义词,或者出现3个以上选项词义相近时,没有逻辑推理分析能力很容易迷失在词汇细节含义上。

2. 学会抓大放小的解题思路

不同于其他题目对错明确,GRE等价题中选项的正确性往往不是绝对的,有时候正确选项本身也存在一定瑕疵。有些词单独来看可能意思并不太贴切,放在句子中并不是最佳选择。但只要这个选项能跟另一个选项确保意思一致,那么它毫无疑问就是正确的。反过来说,一个词汇如果单独放入句子中意思通顺,但却没法在剩余选项中找到可以匹配的答案,那么它也无法被选为最后答案。许多思维模式比较单一的考生,常会在这种相对正确性的问题上纠结,不明白抓大放小的道理,努力想要寻找出最完美的答案,最后白白浪费了许多考试时间。

3. 了解核心词汇的同近义词

等价题对于词汇的要求不仅体现在知道基本字面意思的地步,还有着更深一层的要求,那就是对于词汇的同义近义词需要有所了解。因为等价大多数时候其实都是在选同义近义词。假如考生在背单词的时候是一个个生词孤立地记忆,或者只背中文不背英文不看例句,那么在面对等价题时就很容易出现找不到同近义词或者找到太多中文意思相近的词无法分辨的情况,而这两种情况对于考生解决等价题都会形成很大障碍,严重干扰考生做出正确判断。

GRE等价题解题思路真题精讲

Researchers who study circadian rhythms have found that the physiological processes of animals and plants are neither independent of, nor entirely ___________ external stimuli, such as light and temperature, during a given 24-hour period.

A. imperiled by

B. analogous to

C. coincident with

D. perturbed by

E. appurtenant to

F. concomitant with

正确答案:C F

思路解析:本题关键在于neither independent of, nor和external stimuli。整句大意为研究昼夜规律的学者们发现动植物的生理过程既不完全独立、也并非完全与光亮温度等外界刺激保持一致。空格中所选词汇应该与indepent of含义相反。因此,C的保持一致和F的伴随共存在含义上最为接近,所以是正确答案。

A有受到威胁的含义,而本句中并未提到昼夜变化会受到外界刺激的威胁。同时这个选项也无法和indepent形成反义关系。

B指的是不同事物之间的相似性可比性。而本句中的昼夜变化和外界刺激之间更多的是一种原因和结果的关系,而非相似性比较。所以错误。

D的意思是思维受到很大的干扰。主要是指的精神情感方面的问题,和本句中提到的物理变化关系不大。

E的含义是指附带附属,跟本句意思无关。

综上所述,GRE等价题作为整个考试语文VERBAL部分中难度较高的题型,考生想要顺利做好掌握正确的解题思路和技巧是必不可少的。小编希望通过上文讲解的GRE等价出题思路和解题技巧,考生能够学到更多应对GRE等价题的方法策略,顺利完考试拿到高分。

GRE填空的题型差异

(一)新GRE考试题型差异

新GRE考试难度主要来自对单词理解和逻辑的分析段落题目要将所有空格填完并且完全正确才得分

GRE句子填空单句题目要两个选项都入选才正确

(二)变与不变的辩证

如表所示:新考题在形式上是做了较大的调整。题干、选项、还是计分原则都有变化。但是,如果剥离这些表面东西后,我们可以发现其实核心的东西没有任何变化-----GRE依旧是一个以句子、段落为载体的逻辑考试。

就题目而言,样题的题目就有几个题目是我们明确知道出处的。Sample Text Completion Questions第4题就是来自92国内题目;而Sample Sentence Equivalence Questions第2题就是No. 9的题目。答案都一样,只是在干扰选项上做了一点调整(具体见样题分析)。

换句话说,就是形式作了一点微调。核心东西都没有变化。

(三)新GRE考试备考策略调整

那么,对于广大考生来讲。备考中对于这些细节应该怎样看待呢?或者说,应该在具体复习和解题操作上作出哪些调整,才能在最少的时间内,尽快将这个变化适应过来呢?

1.背诵并深刻理解gr填空部分单词。并按照考试新要求,自己尝试作类别词汇收集。

2.踏实提高英语水平,充分重视长句,难句阅读能力提升。

3.认真研究过去考题。没有必要觉得考试改革了,将旧题完全否定,相反,我觉得应该吧旧题更加积极利用起来。不仅仅是消极做题,还要按照从样题来的思路模拟ETS思路,看这些题目可以怎样改进成为新题。题干可以做哪些调整,题目单词可以加入哪些做替换。倘能如此,何愁GRE不克。

GRE填空怎么选择复习资料

1. 《陈圣元句子填空》。填空的入门资料,每套题后面都有很详细的解释,是最佳的入门练习。

2. 陈琦《填空7套》。有一定的针对性。做完之后一定要反思,反思,再反思。如果能够结合陈琦的录音反思,那么效果就更好了。

3. 《绿皮填空》。这个里面有很多题目是和前面两个资料重复的。不过这也是最接近现在考试题目类型的练习。用来作为后期练习最好。关键还是两个字:反思。

备考新GRE填空有哪些要点呢?

新GRE填空备考要点一:逻辑。看到GRE考试填空题之后,很快的去思考这道题是在强调一个什么样的逻辑。相等?相反?强调?进一步解释?或者并列?与其反复的去看题目,不如很直接的抓住句子中的逻辑关系,这样就知道了解题的方向了。

新GRE填空备考要点二:关键词。找到了逻辑关系之后,就抓住了解题的方向。在有了大的方向的情况下,找到关键词,便可以很快的解题了。

最后,做好GRE填空需要大量的练习与反思。如果没有时间大量的去练习,也至少应该花一部分的时间出来去反思做错的题目,是因为单词不会?还是逻辑没把握住?还是其它的原因。有反思,才有进步。盲目的努力,只是在给自己的失败找借口。

GRE填空如何高效作答

例1:To believe that a culture’s achievement can be measured by the --- ---- of its written material requires one to accept that a page of junk mail is as ------- as a page of great literature.

A、nature... readable B、quality... prevalent

C、timelessness... understandable

D、applicability... eloquent E、volume... valuable

这个空的第二个选valuable是我比较确定的。比readable和其他的要好,但是第一个空对volume想不通,但是又不能说这个词肯定错,只能说不懂。这个nature看来好象有点通,但是又不是最好的,因为这个nature是万能词汇,很多地方可用。怎么办,许多时候我们的思维便开始保守。这个volume不懂什么意思,干脆就选a吧。Readable似乎也通。而且煞有介事的给readable找了一些成立的理由。

这是一个思维的误区。一定要记住。对valuable这样几乎必对的词要优先选择。除非在你把整个句子透彻理解的情况下完全排除了他的搭档的可能性。否则在句意一团模糊的情况下,优先选择自己还比较拿得准的。这样赌成功率大。

例2:It is no accident that most people find Davis’ book disturbing, for it is -- ---- to undermine a number beliefs they have long -------

A、calculated..cherished B、annotated..assimilated

C、intended..denied D、anxious..misunderstood

E、reputed... anticipated

这个空也一样,只有cherished比较肯定,逻辑和语感都符合,但是第一个空不知所云,这里的calculated的意思绝非计算这么简单,自己的功力不能解出,那么,放弃这个空吗?这么好的cherished难道就放弃了吗?看看其他的,CE肯定不对,因为意思不对。B这个词由于自己不太理解所以显得似乎可能正确,而前面的annotated也让我糊涂;D的anxious似乎有点门道,但是misunderstood不是特别通,但是如果勉强可能有点点通。

怎么办,肯定要蒙了。这时候最怕思维方式就是为这个misunderstood存在找理由,从而迎合前面的anxious,于是似乎很完美的解决了这个空,这其实是人的一种本能的完型心理,或者说溺水人要抓救命稻草的心理,尤其是那些不太自信的应试者。这时往往是阵脚大乱,完全不是凭理性而是凭自己的想象力来作题。所以克服了这种心理,你遇到摸棱两可的题目答对的几率会猛长。

这时你面临的情况是这样的,cherished是完美的。但是calculated死活想不通是什么意思。而那个misunderstood加入自己的一些想入非非后竟然显得有些象正确答案。这时,一定要沉住气,大胆选cherished。记住,ets的思维是简单直接力求完美的,有cherished在,除非有和 cherished一样完美的答案,否则就不会象许多中国老师一样故意找一些似是而非的东西迷惑你,我们受这些老师的影响太深,所以在考虑问题的时候免不了要多绕一个弯。一定要克服这个误区。希望大家多找些类似的例句,看看这个规律是不是存在。

例3:Given the failure of independent laboratories to replicate the results of Dr. Johnson’s experiment, only the most ------- supporters of her hypothesis would be foolish enough to claim that it had been adequately -------

A、fastidious... defined B、partisan... verified

C、vigilant... publicized D、enlightened... researched

E、fervent... undermined

语感的作用:adequately这样的副词如果大家积累多的话就会知道,多跟正面动作有关,充分的证明,充分的考虑,有没有这样的说法,充分的破坏呢?这种写法是不是显得有些残忍的幽默,是一个美丽的错误呢?

GRE写作:分类解析 篇7

对于驳论文(Argument)而言,熟悉题库更为重要。很多人觉得一个题目拿过来随便就能挑出五六个错误。正常情况下是这样的,但的确有些难题若不事先好好准备,五分钟之内能找出两个错误就不错了。在第一次考试时,我正是因为在准备时放掉了一道我只找出两个错误的题目,而在正式考试时恰恰碰到了这道题目,所以写得很不好。

虽然逻辑作文满分只有6分,可千万别小看了它的重要性。从某种程度上来说,它是GRE作文的精华——因为GRE考试的就是逻辑,用英语写两篇作文只是形式而已,主要目的就是考察你的逻辑分析水平。

gre考试阅读训练怎么办 篇8

GRE阅读训练模式的意义群训练:

取几个与阅读对象意思相同的相邻单词,而不是一个单词。同时,避免大声朗读,克服内心的声音和喉咙、嘴唇的震动。

第二点:

眼睛在gre考试阅读材料上比在心脏或喉咙上移动得快

GRE阅读训练模式的非回顾性训练:

为了确保第一次阅读时注意力集中,避免回头看,关键是:

第三点:

读这篇文章时,要注意整句话回头看的现象,坚持一直往下看

GRE阅读训练模式的合理化训练:

根据文中上下文的逻辑推理,我们不知道在哪里进行理性推理。

第四点:

如果你不知道地点,用理性推理来推理

GRE阅读训练模式中速度与理解的平衡点训练:

提出了速度与理解的平衡点,并根据阅读的难度和重要性调整了现场阅读的速度。

第五点:

坚持下去,不要半途而废,这很重要。

GRE阅读的突破方法:集中突破法

我先师在N次的感悟及扫遍所有市面上见到和见不到的出国考试阅读题的基础上,创出一套以此法为依托的《葵花宝典》,最终实现了上面所言之境界。集中突破法,顾名思义,就是在短时间里集中突破思维的极限达到出题人的高度去审视每道题背后的东西,从而提前迅速地围追堵截,实现阅读飞跃。

GRE阅读突破原则:10—15天,以NO题为蓝本,《难句》一书为文火培元固本,再辅以LSAT武火锤炼。但是前提是你现在已经做完所有的NO题一遍,且已经达到第三阶段的要求与现象,即在规定的时间内错题在3—5以内,规定时间是在15—18分钟内。记住:集中突破法直接决定你最后达到的阅读境界,所以一个人一生只能用一次,如果你还没有这种水平,奉劝你切勿操之过急,否则永远也达不到一个全新的高度,一定要达到第三阶段的水平再练,切记!另外,一旦开始,就不能停下,直至完成,否则前功尽弃,后果不堪设想!

GRE阅读:法国二月革命

In February 1848 the people of Paris rose in revolt against the constitutional monarchy of Louis-Philippe. Despite the existence of excellent narrative accounts, the February Days, as this revolt is called, have been largely ignored by social historians of the past two decades. For each of the three other major insurrections in nineteenth-century Paris—July 1830, June 1848, and May 1871—there exists at least a sketch of participants’ backgrounds and an analysis, more or less rigorous, of the reasons for the occurrence of the uprisings. Only in the case of the February Revolution do we lack a useful description of participants that might characterize it in the light of what social history has taught us about the process of revolutionary mobilization. Two reasons for this relative neglect seem obvious. First, the insurrection of February has been overshadowed by that of June. The February Revolution overthrew a regime, to be sure, but met with so little resistance that it failed to generate any real sense of historical drama. Its successor, on the other hand, appeared to pit key socioeconomic groups in a life-or-death struggle and was widely seen by contemporary observers as marking a historical departure. Through their interpretations, which exert a continuing influence on our understanding of the revolutionary process, the impact of the events of June has been magnified, while, as an unintended consequence, the significance of the February insurrection has been diminished. Second, like other “successful” insurrections, the events of February failed to generate the most desirable kinds of historical records. Although the June insurrection of 1848 and the Paris Commune of 1871 would be considered watersheds of nineteenth-century French history by any standard, they also present the social historian with a signal advantage: these failed insurrections created a mass of invaluable documentation as a by-product of authorities’ efforts to search out and punish the rebels.

Quite different is the outcome of successful insurrections like those of July 1830 and February 1848. Experiences are retold, but participants typically resume their daily routines without ever recording their activities. Those who played salient roles may become the objects of highly embellished verbal accounts or in rare cases, of celebratory articles in contemporary periodicals. And it is true that the publicly acknowledged leaders of an uprising frequently write memoirs. However, such documents are likely to be highly unreliable, unrepresentative, and unsystematically preserved, especially when compared to the detailed judicial dossiers prepared for everyone arrested following a failed insurrection. As a consequence, it may prove difficult or impossible to establish for a successful revolution a comprehensive and trustworthy picture of those who participated, or to answer even the most basic questions one might pose concerning the social origins of the insurgents.

12.1. According to the passage, “a useful description of participants” (lines 11-12) exists for which of the following insurrections of nineteenth-century France?

I. The July Insurrection of 1830

II. The February Revolution of 1848

III. The June insurrection of 1848

IV. The May insurrection of 1871

(A) I and III only

(B) II and IV only

(C) I, II, and III only

(D) I, III, and IV only

(E) II, III, and IV only

12.2. It can be inferred from the passage that support for the objectives of the February Revolution was

(A) negligible

(B) misguided

(C) fanatical

(D) spontaneous

(E) widespread

12.3. Which of the following, best describes the organization of the second paragraph?

(A) The thesis of the passage is stated and supporting evidence systematically presented.

(B) Two views regarding the thesis presented in the first paragraph are compared and contrasted.

(C) Evidence refuting the thesis presented in the first paragraph is systematically presented.

(D) The thesis presented in the first paragraph is systematically supported.

(E) The thesis presented in the first paragraph is further defined and a conclusion drawn.

12.4. It can be inferred from the passage that the author considers which of the following essential for understanding a revolutionary mobilization?

(A) A comprehensive theory of revolution that can be applied to the major insurrections of the nineteenth century

(B) Awareness of the events necessary for a revolution to be successful

(C) Access to narratives and memoirs written by eyewitnesses of a given revolution

(D) The historical perspective provided by the passage of a considerable amount of time

(E) Knowledge of the socioeconomic backgrounds of a revolution’s participants

12.5. Which of the following can be inferred about the “detailed judicial dossiers” referred to in line 49?

(A) Information contained in the dossiers sheds light on the social origins of a revolution’s participants.

(B) The dossiers closely resemble the narratives written by the revolution’s leaders in their personal memoirs.

(C) The information that such dossiers contain is untrustworthy and unrepresentative of a revolution’s participants.

(D) Social historians prefer to avoid such dossiers whenever possible because they are excessively detailed.

(E) The February Revolution of 1848 produced more of these dossiers than did the June insurrection.

12.6. Which of the following is the most l.ical objection to the claim made in lines 38-39?

(A) The February Revolution of 1848 is much less significant than the July insurrection of 1830.

(B) The backgrounds and motivations of participants in the July insurrection of 1830 have been identified, however cursorily.

(C) Even less is known about the July insurrection of 1830 than about the February Revolution of 1848.

(D) Historical records made during the July insurrection of 1830 are less reliable than those made during the May insurrection of 1871.

(E) The importance of the July insurrection of 1830 has been magnified at the expense of the significance of the February Revolution of 1848.

12.7. With which of the following statements regarding revolution would the author most likely agree?

(A) Revolutionary mobilization requires a great deal of planning by people representing disaffected groups.

(B) The objectives of the February Revolution were more radical than those of the June insurrection.

(C) The process of revolutionary mobilization varies greatly from one revolution to the next.

(D) Revolutions vary greatly in the usefulness of the historical records that they produce.

注:本文为网友上传,旨在传播知识,不代表本站观点,与本站立场无关。若有侵权等问题请及时与本网联系,我们将在第一时间删除处理。E-MAIL:iwenmi@163.com

上一篇:事业部总设计师负责制下一篇:科技风险突发事件应急处置预案

付费复制
期刊天下网10年专业运营,值得您的信赖

限时特价:7.98元/篇

原价:20元
微信支付
已付款请点这里联系客服
欢迎使用微信支付
扫一扫微信支付
微信支付:
支付成功
已获得文章复制权限
确定
常见问题