ted演讲观后感中文

ted演讲观后感中文（精选4篇）

ted演讲观后感中文 篇1

TED演讲 ：创造力自信心的培养

IDEO的创始人David Kelley在与癌症搏斗的日子里，脑海里开始思考这样一个问题：“我降生到这个地球上的使命是什么?” 当他回顾自己生命的时候发现，帮助人们发挥创意潜能是一个值得努力的目标。他希望通过帮助更多的人树立创造力自信，来改变世界。去年，David Kelley出了一本书，Creative Confidence (中文译本《创新自信力》)。书中告诉人们一个道理：创意绝不是少数人的天赋，而是人人都可以带着意识去改善世界。

什么是创造力自信?

一句话概括，就是相信自己拥有改变世界的创新才能。在心理学上，这种自信也称为自我效能。自我效能(self-efficacy)是指人们对自己是否能够成功地进行某一成就行为的主观判断，它与自我能力感是同义的。一般来说，成功经验会增强自我效能，反复的失败会降低自我效能。高自我效能的人通常都是乐观的，能够积极行动，勇于承担挑战，并且努力克服障碍。

创造力自信从哪里来?

好奇心、想象力、勇气，这些我们小时候都具备的特质，反而到了成年后会容易逐渐消逝，恐惧占了上风。我们学会了经验判断，习惯给自己安置在舒适圈里面，尽量在公众面前保持一种专业的姿态，避免“露短”，甚至不愿意去做一些充满不确定性的，有可能会失败的事情。重新找回创造力自信，首先需要有勇气迈出第一步，哪怕这一步可能是错的。

创造力自信如何培养?

第一，克服失败恐惧症。每个人都有恐惧，对于未知的恐惧，对于失败的恐惧，对于他人评判的恐惧等。敢于承认错误、允许自己显露脆弱，反而有利于轻装上前。

第二，在鼓励“建设性失败”的环境中逐步训练创造力自信。创造力自信就如同肌肉，是可以拉伸的。斯坦福设计学院的很多课程就是要求学生团队不断突破极限，从健康的失败中培养出韧性、勇气和谦逊。

第三，把注意力放在“他人”身上，运用同理心做洞察;而非把关注点放在自我推销上，花心思赢得别人对自己的认可。越是没有安全感，越是会阻碍创新发挥的水平。

第四，从团队中获取力量。这个团队，不仅仅是指项目团队，还指社群。没有最好的个人，只有最好的团队。好的团队可以相互激发，相互鼓励，在这种氛围下，很多难题就更容易被克服。在团队中，每个人都是其他人的环境。加入一个有创意自信的团队，会帮助你更快成为一个自信的个人。

第五，永保激情，知道什么时候该做出改变。对自我所处的阶段要有意识地进行识别，当觉察到自己面对现实的挑战已经不那么兴奋，甚至有些疲累的时候，可以回归初心，思考一下让自己永保激情的使命究竟是什么。当偏移的时候，能够有勇气放下一些东西，做出积极的改变。

最后引用TED演讲里David Kelley的一个观点：

创造力不是天赐的才华，而是人生而拥有。而为创造插上现实的翅膀，拥有敢于创造的自信心，人才能真正认识并掌控自己。

[ted演讲稿中文自信]

TED演讲观后感—为什么快乐 篇2

情绪有多种多样，如果非要形容，一天结束我们总可以在快乐和不快乐间做出选择。很多人都自然的把自己的情绪归结于所经历的事，所处的外部环境，几乎没人会想起我们自己才是情绪的制造者。

Doctor发现——Happiness can be synthesized。很多人都认为natural happiness和synthesized happiness中明显后者是次等品，因为前者是我们得到了自己本来就很渴望的事物，而后者是带着笑容面具接受并不使自己十分满意的事物。表面上看，或许natural happiness更胜一筹，但研究表明，synthesized happiness往往更加持久有效。

当大家产生合成快乐的时候，他们是真正的、从心中改变接受了对于这些事物的看法，同时自身审美也在原来基础上发生了变化，只是大家没有意识到合成的快乐在什么时候对自身产生了效果。举个贴近大家的例子，爸爸去哪儿是最近热播的综艺，里面一个重要的环节就是选房子，房子本身的美丑好坏显而易见，前几期宝贝们总会因为选到坏房子而沮丧、苦恼、不平衡，但是经过大人们的引导，他们会渐渐发现其中拥有的“美丽”风景，可能这些本身都只是为了安慰他们的方式，但最后孩子们就会真的会去接受并喜欢上这些房子，甚至到最后几期，他们会明显的取选择这些差房子。天真的宝贝们是不会去考虑节目效果或者观众口评的，他们选择因为他们喜欢。所以说，很多时候美由心生。如果你总是发现身边有太多的不满意，不妨先抹去眼前的尘埃，怀着快乐的心情去看看周围的风景。

ted演讲观后感中文 篇3

How to achieve work-life balance —— Feedback This issue between work and life is so popular that most of us can’t escape, including the speaker.The speaker once was a classic workaholic who often neglected his family.Later, he found it dull and unsatisfied, which made up his mind to look into people’s struggling with work-life balance.And he shared us with his four observations.Firstly, if people want to make any progress on this issue, we must have a necessary useful method.Such as flexi-time, paternity leave and dress-down Fridays have been proved not so useful as expected.They all served to mask the core issue that certain jobs and career choices are fundamentally incompatible with being meaningfully engaged with family.The second observation is that we need face the truth that corporations aren’t going to solve this issue for us.The reason is obvious for companies, why should they concern their employees’ life? All they think and want is to make sure of us well-utilized.So, as individuals, we should take control and responsibility for the type of lives that we want to lead instead of looking for helps.If you don’t design your life, someone else will be your designer, and you may not like their idea about balance.The third observation is we have to be careful with the time frame that we choose upon which to judge our balance.We had better sit down and wrote out a detailed, step-by-step description of our balanced day.Maybe we have too much thing which can’t finish in one day, we must elongate our time rationally.To balance our work and life, there must be a middle way.The last one, we need to approach balance in a balanced way.Being balanced doesn’t mean dramatic upheaval in your life.With the smallest investment in right places, you can radically transform the quality of your relationships and the quality of your life.In conclusion, if we can make progress in work-life balance, then we can transform society.We can convert the society’s definition of success into a more thoughtful and balanced definition of what a life well-lived looks like.

TED演讲感想 篇4

After watching 10 TED videos, I found this—More Stuff, Less Fun is very interesting.Mostly it’s because the speaker use multiply ways to make his speech appealing.I would like to break down this video by using the following points.Opening: Interesting one, rise a question at first to increase the audience’s interest.He caught people’s eyes in the first 15 seconds.Point: He used a symbol “< = >” to represent “less equals more” is a pretty good move.Evidence: Using his house design as an example to convince people less equals more.Listing things you needed under multiplecircumstances to make us realize that we don’t need that much stuff.Showing multifunctional spaces and housewares to make us believe it’s possible.Reasoning: Begin with the problems normal American’s are facing: too many stuff.As a country whose 73% of GDP is come from consuming, overloaded stuffs has led to debts, less environmental friendly and stress.Then he presented his point as a solution to this problem.He encouraged people to edit their stuff ruthlessly and showed it’s also possible that demands can be met with few things in our house.As a designer, he also presented a few designs that make the house

comfortable and simple at the same time.At the end, he summarizes the speech and stresses his points: Make Room for the Good Stuff.Assistance: Using extremely-brief style PPT to support his idea of simple.He controlled the PPT, not the other way around.